Evaluation of Data Governance, Management, and Validity
OCIO and OEDA evaluate the feasibility and operational benefits of implementing more
fine-grained access controls within ARC and EDW.
OCIO and OEDA evaluate the feasibility and operational benefits of implementing more
fine-grained access controls within ARC and EDW.
OCIO implement capabilities to analyze ARC data directly, with an analytics tool within
ARC or through localized tools with direct connections to ARC, to reduce the creation and
use of manual workarounds by users.
The Agency evaluate the cost and benefits of employing Artificial Intelligence3 solutions
to improve operational efficiencies in data validation, reporting, and analytics.
The Agency evaluate the cost and benefits of right-sizing its computing platforms to align
with user requirements for current and predictable future business priorities to improve
operational efficiency.
OCIO provide users with Zendesk ticket status and prioritization criteria to clarify
resolution timelines and improve user satisfaction within ARC processes.
OCIO and OEDA create centralized and integrated metadata repositories for ARC and
EDW to ensure consistent metadata accessibility and usage.
The Data Governance Board establish written procedures for its operations to enhance
transparency, consistency, and accountability in its operations.
OCIO and OEDA collect and analyze additional data governance KPIs for data
completeness and compliance, as well as metadata coverage, usage, and standardization,
to improve the Agency’s direct and quantitative assessment of ongoing data governance
improvement efforts.
The Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) and the Office of Enterprise Data and
Analytics (OEDA) add governance information to all ARC and EDW documentation to
ensure that users are well-informed and have access to crucial data governance details.
Assign a target amount of days for intake so that management can determine if changes implemented impact the efficiency of the process.